Peer Review Policy

The Journal of Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Signal Processing and Image Analysis is committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic rigour, transparency, and accessibility through a meticulous single-blind peer review process. Here's an in-depth exploration of the key steps in this rigorous and impartial evaluation:

1. Reviewer Selection:

  • Reviewers are meticulously chosen based on their specialization, ensuring a deep understanding of the subject matter.
  • The reviewer pool undergoes continual updates to align with the evolving needs and advancements in the field.

2. Review Report:

  • Reviewers conduct a comprehensive examination of the manuscript's content, methodology, and findings, assessing the overall quality of the research.
  • Feedback is provided with precision, addressing the clarity, coherence, and significance of the research contribution, aiming for a nuanced and thorough understanding.
  • Rigorous attention is given to the methodology employed, scrutinizing its appropriateness, rigour, and adherence to ethical standards.
  • The originality and innovation of the work are critically evaluated, emphasizing the importance of contributing novel insights to the field.
  • Suggestions for improvements are articulated with clarity, ensuring that authors receive actionable feedback to enhance the manuscript's quality.
  • Manuscripts are appraised not only for academic rigour but also for their potential to advance knowledge and make a meaningful impact in the respective domain.

3. Review Period:

  • The journal prioritizes an efficient publication process, with an average time frame of 40 days from submission to the first decision.
  • Reviewers are encouraged to submit their recommendations within three weeks of the manuscript assignment, fostering a timely and responsive review process.
  • Automatic reminders are in place to ensure a prompt response from editors and reviewers, streamlining the review timeline.

4. Decision:

  • Accept: Manuscripts meeting all quality requirements proceed to final editorial checks and publication, ensuring the dissemination of impactful research.
  • Minor Revision: Manuscripts with minor revisions required undergo a rapid review of changes before final acceptance, facilitating swift progress toward publication.
  • Major Revision: Substantial revisions are necessary, and manuscripts are re-evaluated post-revision before a final decision, ensuring the incorporation of significant improvements.
  • Reject: Manuscripts not meeting quality or ethical standards are rejected, and authors are informed of the decision with constructive feedback.

Procedure for appeal/complaint submission regarding the editorial process:

At the Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Signal Processing and Image Analysis, we recognize the importance of providing authors with an opportunity to appeal editorial decisions. Authors dissatisfied with the outcome of the initial review process may submit a formal appeal, detailing the grounds for their disagreement and send it to Editor-in-Chief.

Additionally, authors who believe they have experienced procedural irregularities or ethical concerns during the review process may submit a complaint.

The appeal and complaint processes will be evaluated by the editorial board, taking into account the original reviewers' comments and any new information provided. Our goal is to ensure a thorough and impartial assessment of the appeal and complaints, maintaining the integrity of our publication process.